I get that, to some extent, though often 30 year old products were designed for 30 year old networks and environments, so don't really fit in today's modern scenarios. I'm genuinely interested in whether Globals (Cache/GTM) have solved some problem that Mongo/Couch/Cassandra/Riak haven't seen, in a way that is basically ACID compliant. But I really haven't played with any of them enough.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:18 PM, OldMster <[email protected]> wrote: > Matt, > > One other thing, perhaps the biggest item is confidence. When something > doesn't work as expected in my Cache or GT.M database, I am 99.9999% > certain that it is problem I created, not a bug in Cache or GT.M. That > confidence is based on the experience I've had using them, the years of > experience they have behind them, and the large base of users beating on > them every day in production environments. I don't think I'd have that > confidence with the newer No-SQL databases. That doesn't mean the problem > wouldn't 99.9999% of the time be mine! > > Mark > > -- > Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ > Posting guidelines: > https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "nodejs" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en > -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
