Why are people expecting Node to compare well with nginx or Apache for serving static files? Node is faster than PHP or Ruby, but comparing it to something specifically designed for high performance static file serving is always going to be a losing proposition.
Use Node for your dynamic content. Use nginx or apache for your static content. It's a very simple equation. Matt. On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Cosmere Infahm <[email protected]>wrote: > I analysed node-0.6.10/windows2008r2 running my clustered http server > script in VTune with a view to understanding why node took 50% more CPU > than nginx/apache for a given scenario. The results indicate that > GetQueuedCompletionStatusEx takes 40% of CPU. Does this make sense? > -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
