@Douglas, have you compared it with JSHint? I've tried to configure JSLint to not throw errors, but it's too finicky. I found it very easy to configure Miller's Javascript lint to not returning spurious errors, and it catches additional real errors like functions sometimes reurning a value and sometimes not, and variables not being declared as local.
I haven't tried JSHint -- it does sound more usable. Does it catch all the errors that Miller's Javascript Lint does? On Feb 21, 6:25 am, Mark Volkmann <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand you don't like JSLint, but in what way is it less useful > for routine usage than any other lint tool? > > --- > R. Mark Volkmann > Object Computing, Inc. > > On Feb 20, 2012, at 10:58 PM, "P. Douglas Reeder" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Crockford's JSLint is designed for occasional use, to nudge > > programmers toward better code. It's neither designed for nor works > > well as a routine part of your toolchain. > > > Miller's JavaScript Lint (http://www.javascriptlint.com/) is > > configurable for your project's style, and is a part of my toolchain. > > > -- > > Job Board:http://jobs.nodejs.org/ > > Posting > > guidelines:https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "nodejs" group. > > To post to this group, send email [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >[email protected] > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
