On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Joe Developer <[email protected]>wrote:
> How is that a 'sampling error'? That is exactly who he sought to help, and > help others not end up in their situation without prior recourse. > Because he pushed jslint to be de-facto for everyone, not just newbies, and belittled those whose code didn't comply. > No one is forcing anyone to use anything ( your work environment may vary > ) - but the simple math is this: JS is going to be everywhere, lots of > people will be coding in JS, demand for expertise ( or competence, or > ability to gain it ) outstrips supply. Perhaps we have now established a > population and a level of access to means for knowledge transfer of > sufficient quality for 'the masses' - I doubt it. > > There will likely always be a population that will see benefit from using > jslint, whether as blindmans cane, training wheels, fast-fail indicator or > code consistency enforcer. > I don't disagree - I just want it more configurable to my/our "house style". Because I find it useful that it does catch some errors (there's a large class of errors for example that "use strict" doesn't catch until runtime, which is annoyingly late - I'd like a jslint that can catch those errors, without futzing with my style - it seems clojure compiler might just do that though). Matt. -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
