That's interesting.. xml2js returns a string in JSON format. Using sax-js directly and creating the Javascript object as the file is being read is more optiimal.
There's no reason to parse all that data twice. On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Wan Li <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 7:04 PM, fent <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Have a look at https://github.com/isaacs/sax-js > > > xml2js is built on top of sax-js. I even hacked version to utilize the > streaming API provided by sax-js, but doesn't help too much. > > -- > >: ~ > > -- > Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ > Posting guidelines: > https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "nodejs" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en > -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
