> de&&bug( msg) is much faster when traces are disabled Is this a true statement?
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:36 AM, JeanHuguesRobert < [email protected]> wrote: > On 29 fév, 00:33, Phoscur <[email protected]> wrote: > > How is this better than: > > function debug(msg) { > > if (DEBUG_ON) { > > console.log(msg); > > }} > > > > ? > > de&&bug( msg) is much faster when traces are disabled. Idem with > de&&mand() vs assert(). > > -- > Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ > Posting guidelines: > https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "nodejs" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en > -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
