Am Donnerstag, den 08.03.2012, 09:33 -0800 schrieb dvbportal: > The password hashes and salts of the registry's CouchDB have been > compromised. Per default the _users database of CouchDB is not secured. :(
WTF? "Have been compromised"? It always was that way, and as long as you use strong passwords, it's no problem. You're suggesting it was some kind of attack/mistake/..., but that's not the case. It was "Couch can't do that? Well, then we can't." I really don't understand the buzz.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
