I'm also willing to write and/or port these bindings to nodejs.

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Camilo Aguilar <[email protected]>wrote:

> I think we are talking about including bindings to v8-profiler in nodejs
> core, which make complete sense to me, and shouldn't require a lot of
> effort if we re-use webkit bindings. In this scenario node-inspector will
> be replaced by the web inspector that comes by default in webkit and node
> will behave as an agent of it. I've been also chasing down a memory leak
> and current tools are kind of crapy when it's about taking heap snapshots.
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:11 PM, billywhizz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> yes. +1 for node-inspector in core. it's a really useful tool and is a
>> pain to have to install it separately...
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
>> Posting guidelines:
>> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "nodejs" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>>
>
>

-- 
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: 
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

Reply via email to