Guys, check https://github.com/medikoo/find-requires

-- 
Mariusz Nowak
https://github.com/medikoo
http://twitter.com/medikoo

On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:26:32 AM UTC+2, Bruno Jouhier wrote:
>
> Same way you do it: regexp
>
> On Monday, March 26, 2012 9:49:28 PM UTC+2, meelash wrote:
>>
>> btw, bruno, how do you do the dependency analysis? A full parser?
>>
>> On Monday, March 26, 2012 12:01:41 AM UTC-7, Bruno Jouhier wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a similar thing. Not fully packaged but I published it a while 
>>> ago: https://github.com/Sage/streamline-require
>>>
>>> It analyzes the dependencies server side and supports both synchronous 
>>> and asynchonous requires. Like yours, it returns the entire dependency 
>>> graph in one shot. So the client gets everything it needs in one roundtrip. 
>>> It also monitors changes to the source tree and returns a 304 if the 
>>> browser has an up-to-date version.
>>>
>>> There is one further refinement: when you request additional module 
>>> asynchronously, the client sends to the server the list of modules that it 
>>> had requested before and the server computed the list of dependencies of 
>>> the new modules as well as the list of dependencies of the modules that had 
>>> been requested before and it sends back to the client a single response 
>>> with the modules of the first list that are not in the second list. So, if 
>>> the client had gotten A, B, C, D, E, F in a first require and requests G 
>>> which requires B, C, and H, the server only returns G and H to the client. 
>>> I the client then requests I which requires C, F and H and J, the server 
>>> returns only I and J.
>>>
>>> Overall, this is extremely fast.
>>>
>>> I was doing the dependency analysis client side before and loading the 
>>> modules one by one. Terrible in comparison.
>>>
>>> Bruno
>>>
>>> On Sunday, March 25, 2012 1:04:52 AM UTC+1, meelash wrote:
>>>>
>>>> tl;dr - Client-side require with a server-side component that caches 
>>>> dependencies, bundles them, and caches the bundles. Need feedback on 
>>>> the concept, syntax. Need suggestions/contributions on implementation. 
>>>> Although, this works for me, it is almost just a proof-of-concept, 
>>>> needs work. 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As part of a project I'm working on, I spent a few hours writing a 
>>>> little client-side module loader with a server-side component enabling 
>>>> what I think is a pretty neat meaning to CommonJS module syntax. This 
>>>> morning I pulled it out of the rest of my project and attempted to 
>>>> package it in a useful way for others to use. 
>>>>
>>>> The basic idea is this- in your client-side code, you can use require 
>>>> in either a "synchronous" or asynchronous fashion- 
>>>> module1 = require('some/path.js'); 
>>>> require('some/other/path.js', function(err,result){module2 = 
>>>> result;}); 
>>>>
>>>> An asynchronous require makes a call to the server component to get 
>>>> the file in question, but before returning the file, the server parses 
>>>> it, finds all the synchronous require calls, loads those files as well 
>>>> and returning the whole thing as a package. That way, when the 
>>>> original file that was asynchronously loaded is executed and comes to 
>>>> one of those synchronous require calls, that file is already there, 
>>>> and the require is actually synchronous. 
>>>>
>>>> At this point, maybe this screencast demo will help to clarify how it 
>>>> works: 
>>>> http://screencast.com/t/​nOU53BRYUAX<http://screencast.com/t/nOU53BRYUAX> 
>>>>
>>>> Put another way: 
>>>> If I async require fileA, and fileA has synchronous dependencies on 
>>>> fileB, and fileC, and an asynchronous dependency on fileD, the server- 
>>>> side component will return (in a single "bundle") and keep in memory 
>>>> fileA, fileB, and fileC, not fileD, and it will execute fileA. 
>>>> The client-side also separates fetching the files and eval'ing them 
>>>> (the method of getting files is xhr+eval). So, let's say fileA has 
>>>> require('fileB'); that executes when the file is parsed and executed 
>>>> on the client, but require('fileC') is inside a function somewhere. 
>>>> Then fileA will first be eval'ed, then fileB when it comes across 
>>>> that, and the text of fileC will just be in memory, not eval'ed until 
>>>> that function is called or some other require to it is called by any 
>>>> other part of the program. 
>>>>
>>>> Another example- 
>>>> fileA has dependencies fileB, fileC, fileD, fileE, fileF 
>>>> fileG has dependencies fileC, fileE, fileH 
>>>>
>>>> When I call require('fileA', function(err,result){return 'yay';});, 
>>>> the module loader will load fileA, fileB, fileC, fileD, fileE, and 
>>>> fileF all in a single bundle. 
>>>> If I, after that, call require('fileG', function(err,result){return 
>>>> 'yay';});, the module loader will only load fileG and fileH! 
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully, that's clear.... 
>>>>
>>>> The advantages- 
>>>> Being aware of the difference in synchronous and asynchronous require 
>>>> in your client-side code make it extremely natural to break all your 
>>>> client-side code into small reusable chunks- there is no penalty and 
>>>> you don't have to "optimize" later by deciding what to package 
>>>> together and what to package separately. 
>>>> Handling dependencies becomes nothing. You don't have to think about 
>>>> it. 
>>>> The server can have a "deployment" mode, where it caches what the 
>>>> dependencies of a file are and doesn't ever need to parse that file 
>>>> again. 
>>>> In "deployment" mode, the server can also cache bundles of multiple 
>>>> files that are requested together, so when another client requests 
>>>> that same bundle, it is already in memory. 
>>>>
>>>> To sum up: 
>>>> xhr+eval-when-necessary client-side module loader 
>>>> both synchronous-ish and asynchronous require in your client side-code 
>>>> --the synchronous require is actually a command to the server-side 
>>>> component to bundle 
>>>> server-side component 
>>>> --parses for dependencies and bundles them together 
>>>> --can cache dependency parsing results and whole bundles 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So- thoughts? Is this a horrible idea? Are there some gotchas that I'm 
>>>> missing? 
>>>>
>>>> Specific advice needed- 
>>>> • How to package this in a way that it can be easily used in other 
>>>> projects? How can I make it integrate seamlessly with existing servers 
>>>> and make it compatible with different transport mechanisms? 
>>>> • How to handle path resolution? 
>>>> • Suggestions for licensing? 
>>>> • Suggestions for a name- (Mundlejs is a portmanteau of Module and 
>>>> Bundle- didn't really think long about it) 
>>>>
>>>> Things that need to be (properly)implemented: 
>>>> • server-side "parsing" is just a brittle regexp right now: 
>>>> (line.match /require\('(.*)'\)/) 
>>>> • neither type of server-side caching is implemented (pretty easy to 
>>>> do) 
>>>> • uniquely identify clients and keep the server away of what modules 
>>>> they already have, so we can just send the diff of cached modules- 
>>>> currently, I'm sending the entire list of already cached modules with 
>>>> every xhr call, so the server doesn't load a dependency twice. 
>>>> • proper compatibility with module specifications (i.e. CommonJS)- 
>>>> right now, it's just require and module.exports 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Code is available here: 
>>>> https://github.com/meelash/​Mundlejs<https://github.com/meelash/Mundlejs> 
>>>> To test it: 
>>>> from Mundlejs/tests/, run 
>>>> node server.js 
>>>> visit http://127.0.0.1:1337/ and open your browser console.
>>>
>>>

-- 
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: 
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

Reply via email to