>> I'm sorry if this has been discussed before, but I couldn't find
anything.

It has, probably 10 times a month. :) No joke!

Nuno

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Isaac Schlueter <[email protected]> wrote:

> We're definitely not going to change node in the way you suggest.
>
> Async is the default by design.  Mark Hahn expressed the reasons quite
> well, so I won't reiterate them.
>
> Sync methods look different because they *are* different.
> Automatically switching from async to sync would be a violation of
> Node's core principles, and a disaster.
>
> "Node is not pretending it is blocking when it is not."
> http://www.mikealrogers.com/posts/the-way-of-node.html
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 19:20, Olivier Lalonde <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm sorry if this has been discussed before, but I couldn't find
> anything.
> > This a modest proposal to introduce sync APIs in Node.js
> >
> > A lot of people would like to use Javascript for their web backend, but
> > don't want to program in an async style (I believe those reasons have
> > already been discussed at length).
> >
> > As it stands right now, it is practically impossible to program in
> Node.js
> > in a sync style, since most core modules and native extensions only
> provide
> > an async interface.
> >
> > I believe there would be an easy way to change the status quo without
> > impacting developers who chose to adhere to a strict async style. The
> > solution I propose is simply a pattern for writing I/O APIs: every I/O
> call
> > should be async unless no call back is supplied, in which case the I/O
> call
> > should be sync and use return / throw statements instead of calling a
> > callback.
> >
> > There is probably a flaw in my reasoning since I'm probably not the first
> > one to come up with this pattern. That being said, I think it would be an
> > elegant way to make both async/sync fans happy while keeping all the
> backend
> > JS community focused on one project rather than fragmenting the
> community in
> > multiple CommonJS server implementations.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > --
> > Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
> > Posting guidelines:
> > https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "nodejs" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>
> --
> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
> Posting guidelines:
> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "nodejs" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>

-- 
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: 
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

Reply via email to