Many bindings will extend the original native code's licensing. However, if you preferred to be more explicitly liberal with your license, you could go with MIT for your code and note that the underlying code has whatever license it has.
Daniel Shaw @dshaw On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Liam <[email protected]> wrote: > What's the preferred OSS license for native modules? I'm working on a > binding for the Xapian text-indexing library, which uses MIT/X *& GPL. > > -- > Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ > Posting guidelines: > https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "nodejs" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
