> > In my opinion, people who are interested in streamline and fibers will > already be prepared to take the performance hit in exchange for ease of > use. A better argument would be that you're committed to making that hit as > small as possible. And assuring people that a 2x difference won't often > make a huge difference in practice. I agree with that, and I think it's > easily defensible. This benchmark is not. >
When benchmarking Common Node, which uses fibers, I found it to have 60-80% of the throughput of pure Node and use 10-15% more memory. More details here: https://github.com/olegp/common-node#readme - scroll down to "Benchmarks" http://www.slideshare.net/olegp/js-everywhere-2011/55 Keep in mind that Common Node adds additional overhead due to to the use of wrapper objects & adding/removing a bunch of listeners on every Stream "data" event. Oleg -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
