Why not just find all modules like that and then require them?
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:26 AM, François <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't like to always use "require(...)" and "module.exports =" in my
> code.
>
> That's why I'm asking myself if it would be a good idea to load all .js
> files and run them with the help of the vm or child_process modules.
>
> Then the code would be something like this:
>
> var FS = require('fs');
> var VM = require('vm');
>
> var root = 'app';
> var code = '';
>
> (function read(root) {
> FS.readdirSync(root).forEach(function (entry) {
> var path = root + '/' + entry;
>
> if (FS.statSync(path).isDirectory())
> read(path);
> else
> code += FS.readFileSync(path, 'UTF-8');
> });
> })(root);
>
> VM.runInNewContext(code);
>
> What do you think of that ? Could there be performance issues ?
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
> Posting guidelines:
> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "nodejs" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
