On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 12:42:42PM -0700, Martin Wawrusch wrote: > > >> > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Seiji Sam Lee <[email protected]> > > >> > wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> Due the great expectation around node.js, libs and functions grow up > > >> >> without control. > > >> >> > > >> >> Nowadays we have a lot of "requires" and we need to memorize a lot of > > >> >> names (fs, path, vm, ...); with time, we'll spend more and more time > > >> >> reading > > >> >> documentation :-( > > >> >> > > >> >> My proposal is incorporate the mechanism of "register" the module, > > for > > >> >> example, phpjs library could register the function "isset" into > > >> >> "utils", and > > >> >> "abs" function into "math" > > >> >> > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Joshua Holbrook > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > -1 as I like my modules exactly as they are. > > > > --Josh > > -1 as well. Thank you Josh.
-1 Perl has this, a default export. You'll need a switch to say that you don't want the default exports. Then you're going to need a way to remap the default exports. Pretty soon you're going to have Perl. Actually, I am you're more likely to devolve into PHP, a global namespace full of suprises. -- Alan Gutierrez - @bigeasy -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
