Thank you, I appreciate the information. I think I am going to stick with the SetAccessor() method of parsing arguments.
On Friday, July 13, 2012 4:36:53 AM UTC-6, jas wrote: > > I have been doing some research, reviewing existing material etc. > Following the gtknotify module creation process found @ > http://syskall.com/how-to-write-your-own-native-nodejs-extension has > allowed me to create my own module which compiles and includes without a > problem. > > At this point I believe I simply need to add in some argument parsing to > being adding the real meat and potatoes of the functionality... > > Can anyone tell me why there is a difference in using this method > > > ExtensionName::persistent_function_template->InstanceTemplate()->SetAccessor(String::New("argument"), > GetArg, SetArg); >> >> > And the other writing guides @ http://nodejs.org/api/addons.html which > uses the traditional C/C++ args like so... > > > Handle<Value> Add(const Arguments& args) >> >> > Is there a difference in wrapping them around an accessors object? My > assumption (and have not had time to browse the v8 internals) is that some > string manipulation is taking place in terms of sanitation and encoding. > Any insights from someone with more experience with these libraries? > > -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
