On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 3:15 AM, bo b <[email protected]> wrote: > NO, .js IS refer to static brower javascript . > > if you choose .js as page extension it would be great problem !
It seems that perhaps you're trying to replicate a rather old web development model here. In general, people don't expose mappings from "page extensions" to implementation engines any more. Instead, probably the most common pattern is route mapping in the style of Express and others. You may want to take a look at that. -- Martin Cooper > -- > Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ > Posting guidelines: > https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "nodejs" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
