On Aug 21, 3:34 pm, Felix Geisendoerfer <[email protected]> wrote: > > One silly benchmark I did was executing "SHOW DATABASES" on a stock > > XAMPP MySQL server. With the `mysql` module, the total time taken from > > start to finish was anywhere from ~141-151ms. With the `mariasql` > > module, the total time was anywhere from ~6-46ms. > > That sounds weird. Are you taking the connection time into account? > Otherwise I'm confused why there should be much of a difference for this.
Yes, that was including time to connect. > * mysql: SELECT seems to perform *exactly* as fast as in the June 28 > benchmark, even so this is on different hardware? It's a coincidence, but as far as I know the hardware is different (I am not sure what environment was used for the previous tests). > * PHP: SELECT seems massively slower compared to the June 28 benchmark (201 > kHz vs 345 kHz)? Probably due to a different benchmarking environment. > * mariasql: INSERT performance is better than it is for C? Yeah that was the one thing I didn't quite understand and have yet to figure out the exact cause. On Aug 21, 4:30 pm, "Oleg Efimov (Sannis)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Felix, there is one more difference that I do not take into account in > benchmark: my, your and Brian's modules handle field types differently. That is true, I hadn't thought of that. mariasql 0.0.2 does not do any typecasting at all. -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
