On Oct 4, 2012, at October 4, 20129:50 AM, Domenic Denicola <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Thursday, October 4, 2012 9:47:08 AM UTC+2, Mariusz Nowak wrote: > > On Thursday, October 4, 2012 9:39:43 AM UTC+2, Domenic Denicola wrote: > > I would love to play nicely with domains, but I'm not sure it's as > straightforward as this. Promise libraries wrap all callbacks in a try/catch, > storing any errors for potential future listeners, so there are no truly > unhandled exceptions---simply ones that nobody has listened for, yet. So I'm > not sure how you would surface those to a domain, or if it's even appropriate > to do so. Guidance definitely appreciated. > > > Domenic, I think it's only about unhandled errors, so in fact errors thrown > by 'end', they probably should be covered by domains in Node. I would > definitely not incorporate domain logic into 'then' error handling. > > Ah, that makes sense, thanks. In which case, I think Q is already OK, since > we throw the error inside `process.nextTick` which IIRC means it will be > automatically captured by the active domain. actually, it won't :( > > -- > Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ > Posting guidelines: > https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "nodejs" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
