In this case, source input does not allow back pressure. We have to deal with emit data or forget situation? I hope necessary buffering will be handled by libuv (at the writable stream).
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Alexey Petrushin < [email protected]> wrote: > I don't see how old "push stream" can help to solve this problem. How do > You implement "back pressure" in this case? > > I guess how - with storing it in node.js memory. And if so - how it's > different from new "passive" _read stream API, if in the end both do > exactly the same - store not-readed notifications in memory? > > -- > Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ > Posting guidelines: > https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "nodejs" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en > -- Arunoda Susiripala @arunoda <http://twitter.com/arunoda> <http://gplus.to/arunoda>https://github.com/arunoda http://www.linkedin.com/in/arunoda -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
