I guess that about 50% of projects in npm reflect such state. It would be good if npm have some better procedures for that, like allow to retake the name, and give rights to publish greater versions.
On Monday, December 31, 2012 2:18:31 PM UTC+1, toranb wrote: > > A few months back I took on a dependency of what appeared to be an active > npm module (phantomjs-node) > > But since then it's become clear that the maintainer is anything but. I've > even asked him to hand over the module to someone that is willing to > maintain it. But without even so much as a comment the project appears to > be stuck in limbo. > > https://github.com/sgentle/phantomjs-node/issues/57 > > The issue above was opened a month ago with no reply and I'm curious what > the community can do to help take back this well named but now dead npm > module > > Thank you in advance > -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
