just a matter of taste, if you ask me. for me it's not more or less
readable, just different and requires different reading patterns :)
and Streams beats promises in this case.
Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2013 21:54:33 UTC+1 schrieb Brian Link:
>
> I'v been using the async module for this kind of thing. The above example
> could be rewritten as:
>
> ```
> var fs = require('fs');
> var reader = require ("buffered-reader");
> var DataReader = reader.DataReader;
> var async = require('async');
>
> // You kinda need to understand map-reduce concept to fully grok this.
> async.reduce(
> // Source array.
> ['file1', 'file2', ...],
>
> // Initialize your hash object.
> {},
>
> // Process each file.
> function (hash, file, cb) {
> new DataReader (file, { encoding: "utf8" })
> .on('end', function () {
> cb(null, hash);
> })
> .on('error', cb)
> .on ('line', function (line){
> var reg = new RegExp(";", "g");
> var fields = line.split(reg);
> var value = fields[0];
> var key = fields[1];
> hash[key] = value;
> })
> .read();
> },
>
> // Operate on results.
> function (err, hash) {
> console.log(hash);
> }
> );
> ```
>
> The counter example is perfectly fine (and what I started out with), but
> ever since switching to async I've found my code is a little more readable.
>
> On Friday, January 18, 2013 3:57:30 AM UTC-5, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
>>
>> This is what I was looking for : thank you!
>
>
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
