Thanks, I still haven't figured out why but have another routine which manages to actually display the image. In one call I only retrieve the binary data from the database and hardcode the rest, in the other case I actually build the entire image tag with the binary data on the fly and write it to the response object. The latter works, the first doesn't. I stay with the first.
On Sunday, February 10, 2013 4:54:35 PM UTC+1, mscdex wrote: > > On Feb 10, 9:47 am, Alexander Reichstadt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > res.write('<img ' + firstItem['generic_params'] + ' src="' + 'data:' + > tt + > > ';base64,' + xb + '" />','binary'); > > You don't need to be using the 'binary' encoding here for base64 data. > > What does `tt` contain in the output? > > Can you verify that the `xb` Buffer actually contains valid image > data? I ask that because if `firstItem['dataval']` is a string, you > should be passing in an encoding like 'binary' as the second argument > to the Buffer constructor. > -- -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
