Fair enough. My main goal in writing this was that you could use it in functions that don't actually return promises by passing the "promise" as the callback. I used .finish because I didn't want to make any assumptions about the format of your callback and munging it into a fulfilled/rejected callback.
On Thursday, April 4, 2013 4:21:38 PM UTC-4, Michael Schoonmaker wrote: > > For the sake of providing you with an answer, I would not use this in > place of the existing solutions. There's a lot of wisdom behind the > Promises/A+ specification, and my promise implementations of choice > follow that spec. > > -Schoon > > > -- -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
