Hi Ben, After all, streamline.js was just callbacks. It was mostly a question of who was writing them (you or a preprocessor). I never completely understood why it go people so angry.
I want to reassure streamline users though: it won't go away but I'll probably invest more on galaxy and I'll try to make it easy to transition from streamline to galaxy. This should not be too difficult as galaxy code is just a small variation on what streamline generates with the experimental --harmony option. Bruno On Saturday, June 1, 2013 6:28:20 PM UTC+2, Ben Noordhuis wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Bruno Jouhier > <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > Cleaned it up a bit and just blogged about it: > > > http://bjouhier.wordpress.com/2013/06/01/bringing-asyncawait-to-life-in-javascript/ > > > > > Note that my streamine.js heresy will be over soon. This is plain > > JavaScript! > > > > Bruno > > That's too bad, I rather like streamline.js. Of all the "callbacks > are evil and must be destroyed" solutions, streamline.js comes closest > to how I would approach it myself. > -- -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
