All the arguments are optional.  Only the order matters.  So,
actually, you can just do:

stream.end(function() { 'finished' })

That function is just added as a listener on the "finish" event.

If you find a bug in the `bytesWritten` field, then please provide a test case.

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:40 AM, // ravi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Howdy all,
>
> humour me another round. My question today:
>
> The writable.end() call takes three arguments: (1) chunk to write if any, (2) 
> encoding, (3) callback for when all writing is done.
>
> Assuming there is nothing left to write, I am hoping it is okay to pass null, 
> null to the first two arguments.
>
> And I am guessing it is also safe to assume that the end() will be queued up 
> after any pending write()s.
>
> With regard to the callback argument, the docs say:
>
>> callback Function Optional. Called when the final chunk is successfully 
>> written.
>
> My question is what does “successfully written” really mean? In particular, 
> can the callback rely on fs’s file.bytesWritten to have the correct value? 
> The doc for the latter says:
>
>> The number of bytes written so far. Does not include data that is still 
>> queued for writing.
>
> These two bits suggest the below is safe to do:
>
> req.on
> (
>     ‘data’,
>     function(chunk)
>     {
>          console.log(“Sending “ + chunk.length + “ bytes to be written.”);
>          write_stream.write(chunk);
>     }
> );
>
> req.on
> (
>     ‘end’,
>     write_stream.end
>     (
>          null, null,
>          function()
>          {
>              console.log(“Yay, the file is written. Size is “ + 
> write_stream.bytesWritten);
>          }
>     );
> );
>
> But in my experience, it does not seem to be. If I send 1000 bytes, the first 
> log prints, say, 4 times with 250 byte writes, as expected. But the 
> bytesWritten value is much smaller than the 1000 bytes sent (all numbers are 
> made up).
>
> I can post more fleshed out sample code if/once you confirm my assumptions 
> are correct. I realise there are other ways to do this (e.g: pipe, or listen 
> to the ‘final’ event for the writeable, etc), but I am curious if the above 
> is even expected behaviour.
>
> Thank you,
>
>         —ravi
>
>
> --
> --
> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
> Posting guidelines: 
> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "nodejs" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "nodejs" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>

-- 
-- 
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: 
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nodejs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to