Yeah,

Back to my original post though, there might be room for some future yeild-like 
statement that returns promises and similarly propagates all the way up the 
call chain. I know it's been talked about before at ECMA. That's more 
interesting and potentially less confusing and error prone than using 
generators + promises in the way people are suggesting now.

-Mikeal

On Aug 5, 2013, at 5:05PM, Mark Hahn <[email protected]> wrote:

> asyncSomething would be a pain in the ass.  I hate typing and it would 
> clutter the readability.  Imagine the name pipe having to be asyncPipe.  I 
> would prefer pipe$ or pipe_ which are much more readable.  Pipe_ does the 
> least cluttering.  (I know you probably don't care much about cluttering 
> since you hate coffeescript).  :-)
> 
> In any case there would be a giant argument with thread lengths surpassing 
> even async threads like this. The only feasible solution would be for the 
> BDFL to choose something and demand it.
> 
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Mikeal Rogers <[email protected]> wrote:
> Potentially, yeah, that would be great. Although I think asyncSomething is 
> more likely to take off since ending in $ is likely to trigger more opinions 
> :)
> 
> On Aug 5, 2013, at 4:47PM, Mark Hahn <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Mikeal, it seems this could be solved by a naming convention.  Any library 
>> call that uses generators could start with async, like asyncDoit, or more 
>> reasonably, some convention like ending with a dollar sign: doIt$. 
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Mikeal Rogers <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> On Aug 5, 2013, at 4:16PM, Jake Verbaten <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> The only confusion is knowing whether your using generators for async flow 
>>> control or whether your using them to generate iterators you iterate over.
>>> Once you learn to only use the first type in synchronous fashion and only 
>>> use the second type in an asynchronous fashion the confusion goes away.
>> 
>> This is *exactly* what I'm worried about.
>> 
>> I'm trying to think about this not in the context of "all the code I write" 
>> but "all the code i use, and what they use, and what they use".
>> 
>> If yield becomes a successful pattern a library user won't be aware of all 
>> the dependent generators it has, just like very few people are aware of 
>> their dependencies dependencies dependencies. Yet somehow all of the actors 
>> along this chain have to be sure they didn't use generators one way when I 
>> want to use them another way.
>> 
>> This is very concerning. Patterns should enforce or at the very least 
>> visibly display the compatibility they offer so that actors can coordinate 
>> without active collaboration, this sounds like it depends on a bunch of 
>> people all agreeing about how their API should be used without any visible 
>> indicator stating such.
>> 
>> One of two things will happen:
>> 
>> * Most iterators will be used for async which means that very few people 
>> will write them in a way that i'm worry about
>> OR
>> * Most iterators won't be use for async which means mixing up the two cases 
>> will end in bugs *only* visible at scale.
>> 
>> -Mikeal
>> 
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
>> Posting guidelines: 
>> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "nodejs" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>>  
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "nodejs" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
>> Posting guidelines: 
>> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "nodejs" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>>  
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "nodejs" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
> Posting guidelines: 
> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "nodejs" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>  
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "nodejs" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
> Posting guidelines: 
> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "nodejs" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>  
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "nodejs" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
-- 
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: 
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nodejs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to