Yep.

But the stack trace appears to be almost random; here's another example:

Trace: (node) warning: Recursive process.nextTick detected. This will break 
in the next version of node. Please use setImmediate for recursive deferral.
at maxTickWarn (node.js:377:17)
at process.nextTick (node.js:480:9)
at onwrite (_stream_writable.js:258:15)
at WritableState.onwrite (_stream_writable.js:97:5)
at Socket._write (net.js:651:5)
at doWrite (_stream_writable.js:219:10)
at writeOrBuffer (_stream_writable.js:209:5)
at Socket.Writable.write (_stream_writable.js:180:11)
at Socket.write (net.js:613:40)
at Console.log (console.js:53:16)
at Logger._log (/our/code/deployed/lib/logger.js:43:17)
at Logger.debug (/our/code/deployed/lib/logger.js:17:10)
at Sender.<anonymous> (/our/code/deployed/lib/server/sender.js:50:12)


We're not subclassing event emitter in that code path.




On Tuesday, 10 September 2013 00:08:00 UTC+2, Aria Stewart wrote:
>
> Are you subclassing EventEmitter yourself?
>
>
> Jules <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if this might be a bug in Node.  
>>
>> The only call to process.nextTick in the stack trace is here:
>> https://github.com/joyent/node/blob/v0.10.12/lib/_stream_writable.js#L258
>>
>> Or perhaps we're misusing Sockets somehow.
>>
>> Stack trace follows:
>>
>> Trace: (node) warning: Recursive process.nextTick detected. This will 
>> break in the next version of node. Please use setImmediate for recursive 
>> deferral.
>>     at maxTickWarn (node.js:377:17)
>>     at process.nextTick (node.js:480:9)
>>     at onwrite (_stream_writable.js:258:15)
>>     at WritableState.onwrite (_stream_writable.js:97:5)
>>     at Socket._write (net.js:651:5)
>>     at doWrite (_stream_writable.js:219:10)
>>     at writeOrBuffer (_stream_writable.js:209:5)
>>     at Socket.Writable.write (_stream_writable.js:180:11)
>>     at Socket.write (net.js:613:40)
>>     at Raw.write (/our/code/deployed/lib/server/netsocket/raw.js:34:15)
>>     at Transport._doWrite 
>> (/our/code/deployed/lib/server/transport.js:60:16)
>>     at Transport.write (/our/code/deployed/lib/server/transport.js:52:7)
>>     at NodeTransport.write 
>> (/our/code/deployed/lib/server/nodetransport.js:43:28)
>> Trace: (node) warning: Recursive process.nextTick detected. This will 
>> break in the next version of node. Please use setImmediate for recursive 
>> deferral.
>>     at maxTickWarn (node.js:377:17)
>>     at process.nextTick (node.js:480:9)
>>     at onwrite (_stream_writable.js:258:15)
>>     at WritableState.onwrite (_stream_writable.js:97:5)
>>     at Socket._write (net.js:651:5)
>>     at doWrite (_stream_writable.js:219:10)
>>     at writeOrBuffer (_stream_writable.js:209:5)
>>     at Socket.Writable.write (_stream_writable.js:180:11)
>>     at Socket.write (net.js:613:40)
>>     at Console.warn (console.js:61:16)
>>     at Console.trace (console.js:95:8)
>>     at maxTickWarn (node.js:377:17)
>>     at process.nextTick (node.js:480:9)
>>     at onwrite (_stream_writable.js:258:15)
>>
>>
>>>  

-- 
-- 
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: 
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nodejs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to