There are no plans to my knowledge to add "JSON5" support to npm.

On Wednesday, October 2, 2013, Alex Kocharin wrote:

>
> Sorry for resurrecting an old thread, but have you considered using JSON5 (
>> https://github.com/aseemk/**json5 <https://github.com/aseemk/json5>)?
>> Author's rationale:
>>
>
> Nothing to be sorry about, the issue still exists, and there is no widely
> accepted solution in the community.
>
> Yes, json5 will solve this nicely if it was accepted as a possible package
> info format in npm packages. But it doesn't seem to be happening soon.
>
> Personally, I solved it using yaml language (and package.yaml files in a
> project), and yapm module (https://github.com/rlidwka/yapm), it's a
> wrapper around npm to convert it to json format on the fly.
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 2, 2013 12:02:08 PM UTC+4, Dmitry Pashkevich wrote:
>
> JSON isn't the friendliest to *write*. Keys need to be quoted, objects
> and arrays can't have trailing commas, and comments aren't allowed — even
> though none of these are the case with regular JavaScript today.
>
> That was fine when JSON's goal was to be a great data format, but JSON's
> usage has expanded beyond*machines*. JSON is now used for writing 
> configs<http://plovr.com/docs.html>
> , manifests <http://npmjs.org/doc/json.html>, even 
> tests<http://code.google.com/p/fuzztester/wiki/JSONFileFormat> —
> all by *humans*.
>
> There are other formats that are human-friendlier, like YAML, but changing
> from JSON to a completely different format is undesirable in many cases.
> JSON5’s aim is to remain close to JSON and JavaScript.
>
>
> All this while:
>
> JSON5 remains a *strict subset of JavaScript*, adds *no new data types*,
> and *works with all existing JSON content*.
>
>
>
> On Saturday, January 5, 2013 10:22:06 PM UTC+4, Alex Kocharin wrote:
>
> Hello, everybody.
>
>
> TL;DR: I think that JSON is not a suitable config file format, and I want
> npm to be able to read configs stored in some other way by default. It
> might be just javascript, or yaml, I don't really care as long as it better
> for configuration files than json.
>
>
> So, there is a dependency list in package.json, and it would be a good
> practice to have a comment for every line describing why we require that
> package, why we require that version of that package, what known problems
> we have and so on.
>
> But there's a small issue. JSON format doesn't allow comments in any way.
>
> Right now there are a couple of different ways around it of course:
>
> 1. Non-standard JSON entries like "@comment": "blablabla". Unfortunately,
> javascript editors doesn't highlight it as a comment, and it's just plain
> ugly. Also this violates strict javascript mode, so God knows what trouble
> it'll cause in the future.
> 2. Keep a commented dependency list in a separate file. This violates DRY
> principle, so we could update one file and forget to update another. The
> same goes for /**package **/ hack I believe.
> 3. Use some kind of build system. Just for damn comments in one file?
>
> Also, there's another wrong thing with JSON, it's too strict. You can't
> omit double quotes from keys, you can't leave a trailing comma, etc. JSON
> is human-readable, but it's just not damn human-writable.
>
> Well... I went for 3rd option for a very long time. We used package.js
> file and a Makefile that compile js to json. Yes, that's three damn files
> instead of one. That's an example of our package.js file.
> https://gist.github.com/**4462764 <https://gist.github.com/4462764> . But
> a number of supported packages grew, and compiling this slowly became a
> major pain in the ass. I recently got an issue when I updated package.js,
> but forgot to compile it, and debu
>
>  --
> --
> Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
> Posting guidelines:
> https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "nodejs" group.
> To post to this group, send email to 
> [email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'nodejs%[email protected]');>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nodejs" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'nodejs%[email protected]');>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
-- 
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines: 
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nodejs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to