Yes, it is true, and thanks for your work. I don't meant it to sounded like complains, just mentioned that it's right now not very stable.
And, also it seems that the cause of bugs not in the bindings but in phantom.js itself, seems like it doesn't support such non standard way to communicate very well. On Sunday, 27 April 2014 08:56:52 UTC+4, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Alexey Petrushin > <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> - pahntom.js is incompatible with node.js, there are some non-standard >> bindings, I tried 3 such bindings but for me all of them worked very >> unstable, so I just given up at the end. >> > > You know - the authors of said bindings (myself in particular) are very > open to bug reports and fixing any issues. I've done many updates to > node-phantom-simple in the last year based on bugs reported. > > I will say that it's unfortunate that there are so many broken bindings on > npm, especially given they grabbed the "big" names (I'm looking at you, > "phantom" and "node-phantom" on npm). But node-phantom-simple follows the > node style (error first), and has been battle tested at a large scale user. > If you find bugs it helps everyone if you report them. > > Matt. > -- -- Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ Posting guidelines: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
