On May 3, 2014, at 9:07 PM, Forrest Norvell <[email protected]> wrote:
> As part of more actively moderating the group, I'm also open to your
> suggestions on what we can do to shape this into a more useful forum. If you
> go to the gist where I put the draft of the moderation policy, you can see
> that there are already a couple suggestions. Feedback on those suggestions is
> welcome, as is feedback on the moderation policy itself.
Hello Forrest,
I'd suggest or bring up two thoughts in response to the call above:
1) Consider not forking discussions into Gists. I understand they are editable
and a useful way to form consensus, but the negatives (forking the discussion,
formation of independent consensus and implicit tiering, etc) outweigh that
positive, IMHO.
2) In the informal guidelines I notice there is no mention of discussion
related to NodeJS itself. Is that because (a) that is considered a
closed/private matter not up for democratic debate (not being facetious), or
(b) there is a node-core or equivalent list where such discussion occurs?
Regards, and good luck with your effort. You can add me to your list of
volunteers should the need arise for assistance in moderation tasks.
--ravi
--
--
Job Board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/
Posting guidelines:
https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "nodejs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs?hl=en?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nodejs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
