On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Mario Vejlupek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Rick, > > to clarify you anwser a bit, yes you are right, generators in existing > implementations are incomplete, as it is draft > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:generators > This is just a strawman, the latest specification draft is maintained online here: https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html > it's even suprising that they are in any stable envirnonment(talking about > Firefox). > It's not very surprising, the spec is still in development, will be frozen Dec 2014, but won't be officially published until June 2015. > But what in my opinion, is now importat that they are usable in node as > coroutine solution to callback hell. > As long as you're ok with a potentially moving target, then yes. > If you have any notes on how current implementation would change in near > future please let me know. > Yes, I recorded the resolutions, which could not possibly be implemented yet: https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2014-07/jul-29.md#short-discussion-about-making-generatorreturn-throw-a-special-exception Rick -- Job board: http://jobs.nodejs.org/ New group rules: https://gist.github.com/othiym23/9886289#file-moderation-policy-md Old group rules: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Mailing-List-Posting-Guidelines --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nodejs" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/nodejs/CAHfnhfo4BUUdz%3DZqRCe02KWB07UuC%3D_FaGRuogqDuHNn%3D715Yw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
