Hey guys,

Long time lurker, who wants to try and get more involved with Stephen's
shifting responsibilities.  Is there a "getting started" or "hey new guy
don't E-mail the mailing list" approach to contributing to this?  I've
heard Stephen refer to a COPR every now and then -- I'm aware of the COPR
at [1] which I forked into my own COPR, and then also the wiki [2] with
basic information on actually using Node.JS in Fedora.  The packaging
Node.JS page [3] looks severely outdated, since we are now no longer
attempting to RPM package each individual NPM dependency and instead using
that built in process?  (That was a question)

The other part I'm confused on is that the COPR shows the build was
triggered by a SRPM that was uploaded [4], but then also refers to a git
repository at [5]

I wanted to "cut my teeth" on trying to configure the COPR to do a Fedora
23 build, since I'm still on Fedora 23.  How would I go about doing that?
As I said I forked the COPR and activated Fedora 23 as an option, would I
need to upload my own SRPM based on the git repository, or should I be
setting it up to pull automagically from elsewhere?

[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/groups/g/nodejs-sig/coprs/
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Node.js
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Node.js
[4]
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/nodejs-sig/nodejs-lts/build/181534/

[5]
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/@nodejs-sig/nodejs-lts/nodejs.git/



On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:38 AM Stephen Gallagher <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 04/27/2016 04:19 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > On 27/04/16 03:00, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> >> As for Option 1)? I think someone with more knowledge of the individual
> modules
> >> in Fedora (Tom Hughes? Jared Smith?) would need to figure out how many
> modules
> >> would be broken if we downgraded. If it's sufficiently small, I suppose
> we could
> >> epoch-bump nodejs and its virtual npm Provides: and go that route. I
> don't love
> >> that we will effectively been playing yo-yo with the version in F24,
> but it
> >> would be a solution...
> >
> > Off the top of my head I'm not aware of anything that requires 5.x and
> for the
> > most part I think people try to support at least 4.x and 5.x at the
> moment, and
> > often earlier versions as well.
> >
> > Tom
> >
>
> OK, I did some repoquery magic just now and came up with (unique-only):
>
>
> nodejs(engine)
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.1
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.10
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.10.0
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.10.12
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.10.15
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.10.3
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.10.36
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.1.103
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.12.0
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.1.90
> nodejs(engine) > 0.1.90
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.2.0
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.2.0-0
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.2.4
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.2.5
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.3.0
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.3.1
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.3.6
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.4
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.4.
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.4.0
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.4.1
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.4.2
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.4.7
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.4.9
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.6
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.6.0
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.6.19
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.6.3
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.6.6
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.8
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.8.
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.8.0
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.8.19
> nodejs(engine) >= 0.9.0
> nodejs(engine) >= 4
> nodejs(engine) >= 4.0.0
>
>
>
> So according to this, we have nothing in the package collection that is
> known to
> require only 5.x or later. So that's a point in favor of the 4.x downgrade
> approach.
>
> I don't love the idea of regressing the versions post-Beta, but it's
> starting to
> look like the least-risky approach. We really have no idea what is going
> to be
> broken by 6.0 and I don't want to stick some poor volunteer with
> maintaining
> backports of a dead upstream release.
>
> _______________________________________________
> nodejs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
nodejs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]

Reply via email to