On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 5:03 PM Frank R Dana Jr. <[email protected]> wrote:

> I wonder, should there also be /usr/bin/npm-16 and /usr/bin/npm-18, ala
> /usr/bin/pip3.7, /usr/bin/pip3.8, /usr/bin/pydoc3.7, ... ?
>
> Right now, an 'npm' command always runs in whatever version is  set as
> /usr/bin/node, which makes it difficult to use a non-default version of
> /usr/bin/node-* to install packages — which seems like it could be useful
> for testing purposes.
>
> Or is there some way I'm missing, that the single /usr/bin/node can be
> used with different versions?
>
> Hmm. `node-18 /usr/bin/npm install` seems to work (if the default is
> node-16)... but that feels clunky.
> _____________________________


I don’t think there’s really any value in using a different version of
Node.js than the default to run npm, barring an exceptionally serious bug.
Can you provide a specific example where it would matter?

I think there’s more value in making sure that the latest npm is compatible
with the older runtimes and standardize on that. I’ve got the npm package’s
self-test suite running against all the node versions in the %check section
to catch potential regressions.
_______________________________________________
nodejs mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to