quite selfreferencial, autological or what the word, homologoi, words
describing themselves somehow, then you can have a word X meaning
words describing themselves and a word Y meaning words not describing
themselves, and then consider if X is X and Y is Y.. and if Y isn't
describing itself it means it's an X-word (describing itself as a word
not describing itself).. so Y is X actually, which means that it's not
describing itself, so then again Y is Y, which means Y is X, and so
on, it's the end of the selfreference, which has no end because it's
just that. this paradox has a name, think it was Grelling, a linguist
probably.
Thanks for the post and your intro !
Bjorn
On 4/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
**** ********* ****
sync
((( wave))) (((length)))((water))(((stretch))) shoreline
outououououmouthooooooooooopenshshshshshshout storm
zerooooooseeeeeeeeeeeeme goooooosloslowow
ah a ah
h ah
ah h a h
harvestedandandand sand
(3) (2)sendingsendendsendendending
3 2
1
(1)
go
(0)
t tr tra ace trace ce e el ele elements nts ts s d di dis is sin in
disintegrate in int inte egr ow s the he w wh who ho
whole hole ole le
grows
me men mending
in ng
w wh he her where ere re
t th the there re
l li lies es s
oooooooooooceanssssssssseesssssssky
(2)
2 (1)
1 l li n f (n) lif lift (f) link
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/noisetext/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
