if you lie in bed (or on the sofa, actually, do whatever you want to
do) and have some self-consciousness, it probably implies - now i'm
gonna cut my nails, really, this writing is getting awkward like that
word - implies some kind of projection, and what is that self-image?
somehow it's in space and then have its limitation - top bottom, left
right, and so on. so what is the appropriate external projection? well
the mirror, but it's opposite me, whatever i do is countered, maybe
we're annihilated in the mirror like particles. then, say a live cam,
not mirrored, is that the self-image? ok, another one to consider is
up-down not-mirrored, it's like you dive and are on the other side of
a sphere - if you wave your left hand the projection waves its left
but upside down. maybe that's the type of mirror we should have. say,
space had only one dimension, in-out, or is that two? actually just
one since it's irreversible, we're bound to project outwards. the
projection seems to have a certain view and so on. anyway, what a
silly post. it's a physical fact, more or less, that time and space
are projections of the continuum, the length of a shadow isn't so
substantial - what would be the time equivalent and why isn't that so
intuitive? anyway, why take it seriously as if there wereany substance
in this. what we mean by substance might be just a thing to similar
things - a one-dimensional spread again. content is. the content of a
sentence might be its meaning, but the meaning is exactly everywhere
else. it's like a printscreen image.
