because we use ALL sombb rules and inj as well as playing out of positions are
just some of those rules. Others are ballpark homeruns, weather chart, advanced
running and bunting. This way anything new comes up in 2009 game and beyond we
are covered.
ROBERT
Please note: message attached
____________________________________________________________
Click now for huge savings on quality flooring materials!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/PnY6rbu3i3GpS2b7W8hoPxX3NRERRegwdlhGTLLigl2YDXP5ZoYmj/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
--- Begin Message ---
yes no injuries! if they have usage restrictions then why do we have
injuries?
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Randy Fosmore <[email protected]>wrote:
> I vote to get rid of the rule. I didn't even realize we had it. I made a
> trade a year or two ago, for the last month to cover myself at a position,
> when I realized that I was going to run out of atbats. They were crappy
> atbats to, so I was at a pretty good disadvantage. I've never understood why
> someone would even want to play someone out of position for an extended
> period of time, unrealistic to me. I'll just plan my team roster that way,
> and manage without it, with or without the rule change. Just play with no
> injuries and it shouldn't be that difficult. Randy
>
> > Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 06:50:47 -0800
> > Subject: Re: position restrictions
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> >
> >
> > Are we talking about paragraph 2.3 of the Constitution that says "The
> > 25-player roster must be named prior to the start of the month and
> > must cover every position on the field and have a backup at that
> > position. For the final month, rosters will expand to 40."
> >
> > I vote YES and get rid of it.
> >
> > However, I do support the idea that on the 40 man roster each fielded
> > position have 2 players. One player can cover more than one position
> > (i.e. a backup utility fielder that plays 2B,3B and SS satisfies that
> > requirement for those 3 positions).
> >
> > I rather not see a team try to draft 3 power hitting firs tbasemen and
> > have to play them at 1B, 3B and catcher during the season cause he
> > didn't draft enough at bats at 3B or catcher. I am a strong believer
> > that players should only start at the position that is on their card
> > and evoke the out of position rule only due to injury or lack of late
> > inning bench support.
> >
> > Joe
> > Suffolk
> >
> >
> > On Feb 2, 5:47 am, [email protected] wrote:
> > > Norfolk gives thumbs down also to Lous rule
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bob Oakman <[email protected]>
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Sent: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 2:22 pm
> > > Subject: Re: position restrictions
> > >
> > > Buzz gives the thumbs down on the "Lou rule"
> > >
> > > --- On Sun, 2/1/09, LOU VINCENT <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: LOU VINCENT <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: Re: position restrictions
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Date: Sunday, February 1, 2009, 11:17 AM
> > >
> > > Please everyone respect Robert's request to vote on getting rid of this
> unneccessary rule...........
> > >
> > > ?
> > >
> > > Please try to get this done ASAP, as this will impact the
> draft...........
> > >
> > > ?
> > >
> > > ?
> > >
> > > P.S. - Tim ( Lakeland )........................We are still waiting for
> your selection, as the people behind you are getting excited to select.
> > >
> > > ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,? lou
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >
> > > From: LOU VINCENT
> > >
> > > To: [email protected]
> > >
> > > Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 2:11 PM
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: position restrictions
> > >
> > > I agree.we should get rid of the "LOU RULE ", as this is entirely not
> needed................Lou
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >
> > > From: Scott Fritchman
> > >
> > > To: [email protected]
> > >
> > > Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 2:09 PM
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: position restrictions
> > >
> > > if you can use players anywhere then i see no reason why you have to
> have a backup at all postions.? i vote to get rid of it!
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:06 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > The rules are that way because Lou you wanted that rule in years ago.
> ?However SOMBB advance rules say that you can play players out of postion
> making their rating the worst it can be except for the outfield. ?Lou you
> ask about this rule everytime the subject comes up. ?I will remind you that
> was because we had a team that went to the playoffs playing all year with
> only 1 catcher on his roster. Thus the LOU rule (to be fair most agreed with
> you about putting the rule in). However now that we use strat's rules about
> playing out of position we certainly can do away with the LOU rule as I also
> see no reason for it any longer. ?It doesnt matter to me.
> > >
> > > ROBERT
> > >
> > > Please note: message attached
> > >
> > > ____________________________________________________________
> > > Earn your accounting degree online. Free info. Click Now!
> http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/PnY6rbttHT8XLZ20ExRQA9dHc...
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From:?"LOU VINCENT" <[email protected]>
> > > To:?<[email protected]>
> > > Date:?Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:40:52 -0500
> > > Subject:?Re: position restrictions
> > >
> > > There arn't any true rules..........You can play 8 catchers if you
> want......................The rules state you have to have a player listed
> for each position, and a backup at each position ( although I'm not sure
> why, as stated above )...............
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >
> > > From: [email protected]
> > >
> > > To: [email protected]
> > >
> > > Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 2:16 AM
> > >
> > > Subject: position restrictions
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > ?????????? Just wondering, what are the rules concerning playing a
> position not listed on a players card ?
> > >
> > > And by the way ?thanks Lou the eligibility?info listed in your
> file?saved me a ton of?time. I owe you a beer.
> > >
> > > ???????????????????? thanks,
> > >
> > > ???????????????????? Blaine?????????
> > >
> > > ????????????????????????????
> > >
> > > In a message dated 1/31/2009 12:21:52 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> [email protected] writes:
> > >
> > > Idea I am shopping Thome (know of 1 team with some interest) but Tides
> last year had Lee at 1B who was a 1 and took 1B Pena who is 1 and played his
> 40 hrs in LF as a 5. They did make the playoffs. Might you are anyone else
> be interested in THOME in LF?? I am already knee deep in 1B and will proably
> use one of my 3 C at 1B just to get their bat in the lineup. That would
> still leave Pean and Votto at 1B.? I am seriously hoping to move him as I
> would rather see him go to team that can use him rather than platoon him.??
> > >
> > > ROBERT
> > >
> > > Please note: message attached
> > >
> > > ____________________________________________________________
> > > FTD.com
> > > Shop now and save $15 on Flowers and Gifts from FTD!
> http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/u4MuSHFRkLY7vsadhzzw5IHQT...
> > >
> > > Hello Robert;
> > >
> > > can't believe this work by Lou, life-saver!
> > >
> > > I can see you are well stocked at C and OF..
> > >
> > > I have been offered two RP and two later picks thus far..
> > >
> > > what can you spare for the measley Cubs?
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > ?
> > >
> > > -------------- Original message --------------
> > > From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > > I am willing to trade you my pick for your pick I think mine is 17th
> as I am
> > > > still looking for SP. I will just have to hope there is still 1
> there.
> > >
> > > > ROBERT-VA
> > >
> > > > Please note: message attached
> > >
> > > > ____________________________________________________________
> > > > Take a break - you deserve it. Click here to find a great vacation.
> > > >
> http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2131/fc/PnY6rbu5oQeFhQUqSrazEuEEw...
> > > > D0mEfP0upyEESNkmr/
> > >
> > > style="FONT: 10pt arial,san-serif; COLOR: black"> Great Deals on Dell
> Laptops. Starting at $499.
> > >
> > > received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "NOMBL" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected] <nombl%[email protected]>
> > > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en
> > > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> > >
> > > received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "NOMBL" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected] <nombl%[email protected]>
> > > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en
> > > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> > >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
--- End Message ---
