not when the last block is mostly games I didn't play or have control over and 
some leagues say if a player has over 600 ab's his play is unlimited, just the 
reverse of your thinking.  it's not like I was getting timely reporting after 
each series was played from the managers so I could change my lineup, I was 
lucky to get any results at all.  I'll wait for you to add him to the playoff 
roster and then I'll send my CM in.  If not I've got to cut a league out 
anyways so it might as well be this one,  I know you can get another manager 
easy, but at least I turned my CM and results in on time for the last 5 years 
or so and I know it's not easy to find managers that are  no hassle as I have 
been.    You have been a good commish Robert, I have no problems with you other 
than this.  No reason  to go to the playoffs without one of your star players 
and I'm sure whoever  I'm  playing would want to beat me at full strenghth.

take care
chuck
Las Vegas


As for Kemp and anyone like him with that many PA there is no way he should be 
over used!!!  Emails were sent where I told everyone






-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tue, Oct 26, 2010 11:55 am
Subject: overuseage on my 3 players/ruling ref all those players


Sorry I took so long but gave this much thought AGAIN and here is the results:

I have a questions on these TOM:

1. why is you waited until now to report the use of Hoffman since he was 
already overused and used when in the minors?  Why wait until his overage was 
announced?

2.  Seems to me that I do remember the your email to PIT but I also sent out 
emails that hadn't heard from Pit and would have to auto-play.  Why not advise 
of the problem then?  The games were auto-played and thus whomever auto-played 
them would not have known??  Had you marked the cmi with max of 7 IP then HAL 
DOES pull them after 7 inn! That was not checked on his cmi!!!  Why???  

That being said I am going to allow him to be reinstated as I am not looking to 
punish anyone but should have marked him 7 IP max and Hal wouldn't have 
overused him.

3.  As for Kemp and anyone like him with that many PA there is no way he should 
be over used!!!  Emails were sent where I told everyone:
A.  keep them out of away game if getting close
B.  sent many more update files than ever before in month to assist in keeping 
up with stats sent separately and individually
C. we played 2 less games so that gave everyone more ab/IPA to help prevent 
overuse age which proves no matter what there is going to overuse age
D.  rosters where expanded to assist with preventing overuse age but teams 
elected to continue using regs 
E.  voted on if we should play OCT games w Sept or make them separate months 
and most said combine the 2.  

MOST OF THE OVERUSE PROBLEMS ARE FROM not filling out the cmi correctly:  Not 
checking 7 IPA max or for rp max of 1-2 inn (some not even 2-3 IPA max as an 
example). Anyone think of how fair it is to the teams like Norfolk, Portsmouth, 
Buffalo, Dublin, 
Newton for example that MADE sure that they didn't go over.  Some of those 
teams any others such as Norfolk, Portsmouth and even myself took great pains 
to rest Nelson Cruz (11 PA left as he sent him to the minors all of SEPT/OCT 
just to make sure he didn't go over and it very probably cost him a playoff 
spot, I used pitchers like Zimmerman, Paulino, Norris out of the bullpen to 
make sure none of my rp went over and I know it cost me 1st place!  To those 
teams that didn't go over usage should be rewarded changing the rules after the 
season is over???


The fact that teams with tons of road games in last month of the season was 
known all yr in schedule and should have been taken into consideration when 
making up final cmi.

I polled 5 managers before I sent out the email with the overages (never heard 
from 2 of them) but the other 3 all suggested allowing 2 IPA/pa of over usage 
MAX.  However the email that I thought made the most sense (came from the 
league president Howard whom had Guzman over by 8 IP) was if there was a rule 
in place that is what we should go by.  I agreed then and will stay with now.  
He reminded how many time people wanted to change things during the season and 
each time I ruled that the rules for current must be followed.  So to be fair I 
MUST do so again this year.  

If we are going to change the current rule/s on over usage now is the time 
before the 2011 season.

Sorry! 
ROBERT

---------- Original Message ----------
From: Tom Vanderlaan <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Overusage Discussion results
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 10:33:27 -0700 (PDT)




Hey guys,
I wanted to weigh in on my overuse age on my 3 players.
 
Hoffman- I traded for him in late July and he was already over his innings 
pitched when he moved onto my roster.   I got him strictly for the playoffs!  I 
never once activated him!  The overuse age when he was actually on my team 
happened on 8/8 in which he pitched 3 innings AT OHIO and 8/10 in which he 
pitched a 1/3 of an inning at OHIO. AGAIN I NEVER ONCE HAD HIM ACTIVATED.  I 
DON'T KNOW WHY OHIO HAD HIM ACTIVE.  HE NEVER PITCHED IN ANY OTHER GAME IN ANY 
MONTH BCUZ HE WAS IN THE MINORS.  
 
Vasquez- I traded for Vasquez for a playoff push as well.   I was watching him 
closely through September/October;  I had two games left for him to pitch(last 
two series of THE year) and he had 14 innings left in which they were both road 
games.   I got results back from Lakeland that he pitched 7innings.  I then 
emailed PIT to let him know that Vasquez could only go 7 innings.  I never 
heard a word from him?  Then, I get results back that he pitches a 9 inning 
complete game shutout!  So he went over 2 innings over.  221 innings out of 219 
pitched.  I even pulled him after 5 innings in his 9/25 start to help make sure 
i was good on the road.  Once again I am being punished by NO playoffs. 
 
Lackey went over 3 innings and was over by 1%.  I can't give you any excuses on 
my end for him.  He just got a bit away from me a bit.  I understand if he 
shouldn't pitch in the playoffs.  BUT THE ABOVE TWO WERE SIMPLY NOT MY FAULT.
 
I feel in both cases that Hoffman and Vasquez should be able to pitch in the 
playoffs.
Also from the other teams I can't believe we are going to punish Kemp who had 
600+ at bats and was over 4 at bats and we deem that as no playoffs? THAT'S NOT 
BLATANT OVERUSEAGE.  Maybe Poreda over 11 innings(used like a dog in Sept; 
might not have been forseen either) and maybe Guzman over 8+ may be a bit much. 
 Allthough Guzman was right on usage until the last 4 games of the year on the 
road in which he got used like crazy.  Not sure if a manager could have forseen 
that?  Even Hudson over 3 isn't that bad to me when you can't predict road 
innings the last month and we don't know when road results will come in while 
we all try and get our home games in on time.
That's why guys hold out there home series  so long in the last month to 
control that.
I should have done that.
 
NOT TRYING TO BE DIFFICULT JUST STATE MY CASE.
 
I look forward to a ruling on Hoffman and Vasquez.  And maybe some others as 
well.
 
Thank you-
Tom
DM Dragons



 



Here is the playoff file PLEASE get in cmi asap.

I am sorry but the following players cant be used during the playoffs (# inside 
parentheses indicate the amount of overage): 

Des Moines:  T.Hoffman (6.0) , J.Vazquez (2.1), J.Lackey (3.1)

Howard:  A.Guzman (8.1)

L.V. :  K.Johjima (5), M.Kemp (4), G.Dobbs (7), B.McCarthy (1.2)

PEN:  T.Hudson (3.0), A.Poreda (11.1)


ROBERT
Re: Overusage Discussion

From: Bob Oak <[email protected]> 
To:[email protected], "[email protected]" [email protected]
Cc:[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]


Sent: Thu, Oct 21, 2010 01:37 AM

 



do we really need a change of rules or a change in our own diligence?
with a 40 man roster and the pitcher hitting 3 times per game.;
seems like usage wouldn't be such an issue but I guess the schedule is going to 
get at least 1 or 2 teams every year .
maybe we could ; rather than try to put a number on it (pa/inn) raise the % to 
103 or so.
 
I agree with uniform penalties only
 
on another subject;
the forming a lottery to address a thought of tanking by teams for a better 
draft position will penalaize the truly subpar team that tries to win but 
cannot because  his team is so poor.



---------- Forwarded Message ----------
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected],  [email protected],  [email protected],  
[email protected]
Subject: Re: Overusage Discussion
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:17:23 GMT

Jack I agree we should stick to current rules as I always have in the past).  
So I am asking how do we fix it from here on?  Maybe change reporting rules or 
change so that there are no games in Oct, or divide last month into 2 reporting 
periods?  Wish there was a way to get the game not too have most teams with 
either all home games or all rd games.


Here is what the current rules state:  
1.       OVERUSAGE OF PLAYERS
11.4 Any franchise that has violated the player usage restrictions (overusage) 
will face the following penalties:
a). Owners will lose draft pick for players that has exceeded their player 
usage level. The first occurrence will result in the loss of a last round draft 
pick. The second occurrence will result in the loss of a second-to-last round 
draft pick. Other occurrences will result in the loss of higher draft picks.
b). At the end of each regular season interval, the Commissioner, or his 
designate will check the final statistics for each team. Players who have 
exceeded the league usage level will be immediately fined with correct draft 
pick. Such players may not be eligible for post-season play.
c). Any franchise found to have violated the playing time restrictions could be 
disqualified from the post season.



Things to consider for playoffs after 2010:

I disagree that 20 PAs or 5 IP is a small is a small amount.  I have Neftali 
Feliz with 31 IP and using that # his overage would be 20%!  If we allow any 
over usage then # should be less.

With Neftali I made sure he didn't go over rather than lose him for playoffs 
(had approx 6 IPA left) by not using him until last month.  Should someone be 
penalized by not using anyone with a chance of overuse age and leaving them off 
road games cmi and only playing them @ home (remember I only lost out on 1st 
place by 1 game)?  I also sent out emails advising teams to do the same!   I 
also send out emails that stated home teams should keep watch on road teams 
IP/PA and pull anyone as soon as their limits were reached.  A few did but most 
didn't.  I sent out more backup files this last month then all the other months 
combined (even sent to individual teams upon request)?? Not sure what else I 
can do???  Your help in this manner is needed and appreciated.

Thanks, 
ROBERT

---------- Original Message ----------
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Overusage Discussion
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:54:55 EDT


    Hi
 
Overusage is either inadvertent or intentional.  If it is a small amount - 5 
innings, 20 PA who cares.  If it is 150 PA appearances and gave the manager a 
better chance of winning to keep in the playoff hunt or losing to get a better 
draft pick - then yeah - we should determine a penalty.
 
My team had one reliever who had 61 regular innings and was used 69 innings = 8 
overused innings. 
 
I had 3 home games and 27 road games in the last month and had no control on 
his overusage.  Should I be penalized?
 
Why have 2 different sets of penalties? - playoff teams lose players, 
non-playoff teams lose draft picks. 
* It should be uniform penalty for all.
* Instead of losing picks - teams that abuse overusage should probably be 
penalized by placement in the draft, not lose picks.  A bad team needs picks.  
A good team doesn't want to giive up good plaayers for picks.
*if there is a rule all ready in the constitution - live by it - now is not the 
time to ba making rules. 
 
Jack Howard - Hurricanes 
 

In a message dated 10/17/2010 5:18:23 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:
I was actually talking about 2/3 of an IP but if everyone likes John's ideas 
then we can go with this.  Up to you guys through.

As of now I still havent heard from Pit so check with him as even if Pit does 
stay I am sure someone will not be back next yr as there always are.

ROBERT

---------- Original Message ----------
From: john arcieri <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: ref the 2010 season
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 12:44:45 -0700 (PDT)


  I agree if a player is over the 2 IPA or 2 pa they should be lost for the 
playoffs since maybe without over usage that team might have not made the 
playoffs.  As for draft picks all teams over should lose draft picks not just 
non-playoff teams.  It should be if 1 player = 10th rounder, 2 players = 9th 
rounder, and so on up until a 4th rounder.  All first year  managers should be 
limited to only 3 non-carded players so they have to learn how to manage the 
usage rules.  I do know a person looking at rejoining the league in Ray who was 
the purple manager a few years back.  He has moved to Florida for health 
concerns for the wife and everything is going good for him now so if you need a 
manager for Pitt ray is available to take over a team.  John (north bay)


From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Sent: Sat, October 16, 2010 4:02:35 PM
Subject: Re: ref the 2010 season

maybe u should try again??

Also what should we do about the over usage?  I think playoff teams should lose 
those players for the playoffs (again if they are over .2 IP and over 2 PA).  
However draft picks for those not in playoffs (but are per current rules).  

Never have heard from PIT and have been told he was called and he felt picked 
so guessing not going to hear from him.  Guess time to seek replacement.  If 
replaced then no fines for PIT as always all penalties are vs managers not 
teams.

I am going to leave it to you guys to decide.  Also have playoff file ready but 
waiting to determine which players to delete ref usage problems.


ROBERT

---------- Original Message ----------
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ref the 2010 season
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:29:51 EDT


I understand the logic of avoiding any potential conflict of interest - but I 
would be satisfied with you or anyone auto-playing the games.
 
I have sent Start Draft a message about getting the draft file as an excel file 
for I was unable to do it myself.  I have not heard from them yet.  I can print 
the draft and retype onto an excel spreadsheet if need be.
 
Jack 
 
 
 

In a message dated 10/11/2010 2:08:06 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[email protected] writes:
Yes the season is over for all but the playoff teams.  There are still 2 teams 
unfinished Tides and Pit.  However they are going to be auto-played as never 
heard from PIT about his home games.  Tides has big series w Howard for 1st 
place.  I wont auto play those and didn't think it would be fair to Jack for me 
to play those games!!!!  Therefore CARL is going to play the series Howard @ 
Tidewater, (mark has temp of 104 and cant play them still).  Once that series 
is played then the rest of his games can be auto-played.  Pit has overuse 
issues and was hoping he would play them but again I todate have not heard from 
in a while.  Attached is everything I have and if I heard from Pit then will 
gladly allow to finish games (just send to me as you complete each series and 
advise if going to complete ASAP.  


ROBERT

---------- Original Message ----------
From: Joe Brunetti <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Robert should I adjust CMs
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:44:03 -0400 (GMT-04:00)

is the season over?  When does trading start?

Thanks,

Joe
Suffolk


-----Original Message-----
>From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Oct 1, 2010 1:08 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: Robert should I adjust CMs
>
>you can if the teams want you too.  If not you should note those player and 
>watch them while playing them during the game.  AS soon as they reach their 
>PAs limit (down to 0 PAs) then pull from the game and send too the minors for 
>all remaining games.  
>
>ROBERT
>
>---------- Original Message ----------
>From: john arcieri <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Robert should I adjust CMs
>Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
>
>  I have 3 series left with Pitt, Ohio, and Buff.  All 3 have serious usage 
>problems.  Is it OK to demote a player who is almost overused or should I just 
>play the games?  I will have them all to you by tomorrow.  I also did notice 
>that many who are over carry to many prospect with low innings or ABs.  Not 
>the 
>CM fault but not planning their usage enough.  North bay
>
>
>
>      
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>"NOMBL" group.
>To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>[email protected].
>For more options, visit this group at 
>http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________
>Mortgage Rates Hit 3.25%
>If you owe under $729k you probably qualify for Obama's Refi Program
>http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/4ca6160ddcf6492d7fst04duc
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>"NOMBL" group.
>To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>[email protected].
>For more options, visit this group at 
>http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.


____________________________________________________________
SHOCKING: 2010 Honda Civic for $1,732.09
BREAKING NEWS: High ticket items are being auctioned for an incredible 90% off!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/4cb360516ccb6218133st05duc

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.

 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.


____________________________________________________________
SHOCKING: 2010 Honda Civic for $1,734.09
SPECIAL REPORT: High ticket items are being...
memphisgazette.com



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.





 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.

____________________________________________________________
Get Free Email with Video Mail & Video Chat!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.

Reply via email to