I'm aware of the flory site but it looks as if you have a separate website. Is the flory website something I can use like it shows that I have 11 draft picks which I would then need to cut to 29 players. Is it correct that there is no DH. League is an April based league Need to read email chain you sent.
From: [email protected] Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:50:53 +0000 To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: PENN (Rbt) has not been getting info please add his email to mail U need to read and follow instructions at the very end of this email to join the group email. Also you can get all the info you need at the league website (have you been getting those either) and that will tell you about all the cuts. Need to ck and see if your roster and draft picks match the info I have you as we have found errors on the site we have been fixing. http://flory.net/nombl/# Any errors/questions etc please contact me ASAP ROBERT ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- From: <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: NCR increased? Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:53:15 -0500 I AGREE..............7 "THE MICK"........................... BUT HARSHER PENALTIES FOR ANY PLAYER WITH 5 ABs, OR 5 IP............OVERUSE.................... ANY MORE THAN THAT THERE IS NO DEFENSE FOR............IT IS EASY TO GO OVER 1 OR 2 ..............BUT NOT MORE THAN 5..............MY THOUGHTS .LOU................... ---- [email protected] wrote: > From Six to Seven...SEVEN in honor of the most beloved player in > baseball...The Mick. > > > ray > > -----Original Message----- > From: vasquires <[email protected]> > To: nombl <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, Jan 9, 2012 8:16 am > Subject: NCR increased? > > > most voted to raise the NCR but the # differed. Therefore we are now voting > on what 2 make the max. > > > ROBERT > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: Gary Brown <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: NCR input > Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 10:41:06 -0800 (PST) > > > > > > I don't think it is all the non playoff teams fault. The playoff teams seem > to have a better core of players with plenty of AB at each position. As with > my team I took over last year(Norfolk), I have been struggling to get good > starting players at each position because when we are able to keep 30 > players. It will take a number of years to rebuild when 30+ players are > protected. > > There are teams with 2-3 top starters at 1 position can sit on these player > without having to play them or play them out of position. I understand if a > emergency situation come up to play someone out of position, but a manager > played a player only rated at 3B at 4 other positions 2B, SS, LF, and RF. > MLB does use some players like this, but not like some managers use them. > Thats why there are utility players with many fielding ratings. > > If the cut down was to 20 with the max NCR the manager wants to protect, then > a wider range of players will be in the draft every year. Every managers > would have to be more selective on which players they want as their core 20. > My 2�. > > Gary > Norfolk > > > --- On Sat, 12/31/11, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: NCR input > To: [email protected] > Date: Saturday, December 31, 2011, 11:55 AM > > > I would be curious, Robert, seems like teams who made playoffs are voting > against raising it to 8 saying it would not help the teams not making playoffs > > WHILE the teams like me know otherwise who did not make playoffs. I suggest > listening to the teams that do not make playoffs on whether or not 8 NCRs > would help a non playoff team. > > Who can not field team with 33 players to cover usage all season? Teams that > are under AB and IP really have no excuse considering all the playing time > available from players left in draft. The amount of NCRs available at 8 make > no difference. Usage problems are separate issues. I could assemble a team > each year made up of 33 players left in draft after completed that could meet > our usage requirements for season. Blaming NCRs will not solve the problem of > overusage. It is a DRAFTING problem. Drafting a catcher with 41 ABs when you > need one with 200 ABs who is available is the problem. I would like to > address usage problems as well but veiling it as an NCR problem is wrong way > to look at it. There are SIMPLE draft rules in other leagues that could solve > problem in our league, such as all usage required must be taken in draft by > end of 8th round. > > Anyway, I would say nothing except I saw a trend of playoff teams almost all > going against an increase in NCRs. > > Also, I almost have ALL my player usage covered with my roster already of 25 > players like major leagues do. I only need to draft 3 relievers somewhere and > I can draft 9 other guys no matter how much playing time they have based on > future potential. > > Research has shown that it takes 4 years average for a team to rebuild and be > competitive in a healthy league our size. I am suspicious of leagues that > have same people in playoffs or first place for 10 years straight. It does > not mean something is wrong, after all there are superior players. But all > other leagues I know and have played in do not have dynasties. Do the rules > in this league favor playoff teams that are making decisions for non playoff > teams on how to rebuild? > > Anyway, either way, I get youth from NCRs or low innings and AB guys because > I take the time to make SURE I have playing time covered BEFORE the draft. I > just find usage problems interesting. The rules our league have for usage are > MINIMUM levels, not RECOMMENDED levels. I live to exceed those limits. What > needs to be increased is either the minimum levels of usage or allowing > players to be used at 110% of MLB. Anyway, too much talk, I just been working > so hard and will finally have a day off Monday to relax and pick up pieces > for 2012. We have a water leak and the guy can't come to fix it till Monday. > It is a trickle but nothing we can do. > > Whatever the NCR limits are works for me. If I was commish (HERE COMES > REASON I SHOULD NEVER HAVE ANY DECISION MAKING RESPONSIBILITIES) After draft > I would calculate usage and if a team did NOT have enough usage I would > require them to DROP an NCR and replace him with a carded guy who gives him > enough usage. If people still overuse after starting the season with required > usage on their roster which must be maintained after trades then usage rule > is too LOW! > This is not rocket science or string theory. Even Penny could figure this out. > > thanks > > ray > BKN To: [email protected] > Subject: bkn drops, draft picks, ncr, roster, NCR input > Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:13:25 -0500 (EST) > > > NOMBL DROPS > 1. RUSSELL BRANYAN > 2. TIM BYRDAK > 3. MATT DIAZ > 4. BILL HALL > 5. AARON HILL > 6. BRANDON INGE > 7. RYAN KALISH > 8. VIN MAZZARO > 9. COREY PATTERSON > 10. MATT PURKE (ncr) > 11. MAX RAMIREZ > 12. BKN#10 DRAFT PICK > > MY DRAFT PICKS(12)- BKN #1-9, NEW #5, BUZZ #6, #7 > > ROSTER (29) > > NCR (4) > 1. GERRIT COLE > 2. BRYCE HARPER > 3. JURICKSON PROFAR > 4. GEORGE SPRINGER > > > HITTERS (15) > 1. CLINT BARMES > 2. PETER BOURJOS > 3. JAMEY CARROLL > 4. IKE DAVIS > 5. ADAM JONES > 6. JONATHON LUCROY > 7. JESUS MONTERO > 8. LOGAN MORRISON > 9. SEAN RODRIGUEZ > 10. JIMMY ROLLINS > 11. CARLOS RUIZ > 12. GABBY SANCHEZ > 13. NICK SWISHER > 14. JOSH WILLINGHAM > 15. KEVIN YOUKILIS > > PITCHERS (10) > 1. CLAY BUCHHOLZ > 2. JHOULYS CHACIN > 3. DEREK HOLLAND > 4. KAMERON LOE > 5. KYLE LOHSE > 6. JAMES SHIELDS > 7. TIM STAUFFER > 8. JOSE VALVERDE > 9. RYAN WEBB > 10. KERRY WOOD > as a team we would be in favor of increasing our NCRs allowed to 8. > > ray > BKN > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NOMBL" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en. ____________________________________________________________ The New "Skinny" Fruit How This Strange 62-Cent African Fruit Is Making Americans Skinny. HLifestyles.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NOMBL" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.
