‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Monday, January 4, 2021 11:24 AM, rosea.grammostola <[email protected]> wrote:
> Again, the fact that NON is not in Debian is mainly because of waf. > https://wiki.debian.org/UnpackWaf > > There where many people who would love to see NON in Debian, but they did > lack the skills or time as well. > > The idea that is has something do to with the developer, is just a example of > a small group gossiping around and confirm each other their reality. If I did > manage to unwaf NON (no way I was the right person for it), then it would in > Debian as we speak. In addition, if male wanted to have NON in Debian badly, it was in Debian already too. He don't see it as his task though, and while it can be frustrating, he has the full right to see it this way of course, because he is right here actually I think. At times he could have been a bit more cooperative maybe though. Secondly, if people are able to unwaf and 'un-ntk' the fork, they could have sent patches to the original project too. Then it would have been possible to get nsmd with a fltk version of non-session-manager in Debian most likely.
