No, that was the article I meant to link to. The term that is being stealthily(?) redefined is "conception". -- Mark Sp.
----- Original Message ----- From: Alan Siegrist To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 4:36 PM Subject: RE: Let's change the definition Mark Spahn writes: http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MmEyYjljMWRhNmFjZDVhOTcyYzE1M2JjMzE3YTU1MzI= I think you linked to the wrong article. Would you mind trying it again? Regards, Alan Siegrist Orinda, CA, USA --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Persons posting messages to not_honyaku assume all responsibility for their messages. The list owner does not review messages prior to posting, and accepts no responsibility for the content of messages posted. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
