[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13544074#comment-13544074
 ] 

Eric Newton commented on ACCUMULO-931:
--------------------------------------

I would graph ingest performance vs # tablets.  I'll bet that you find that 
ingest performance dips when the table splits.  If you prevent automatic 
splitting, or wait long enough for the automatic splitting to complete, you 
should see ingest performance become steady.

                
> Oscillations in Accumulo Ingest Performance
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-931
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-931
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.2
>         Environment: 
>            Reporter: Jeremy Kepner
>         Attachments: 1ingestor.pdf, 2ingestor.pdf, 3ingestor.pdf, 
> 4ingestor.pdf
>
>
> Linux 2.6.32, single node, 32 cores, 96 GB RAM, 3x3TB SATA drives, RAID5
> Ingest performance into accumulo varies by 2.5x.  Depending upon the number 
> of ingestors.
> Performance tests were carried out using Graph500 benchmark (see 
> d4m_api/examples/3Scaling/2ParallelDatabase/pDB10_EdgeInsertTEST.m from 
> http://www.mit.edu/~kepner/D4M/).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to