[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13548823#comment-13548823
]
Keith Turner commented on ACCUMULO-948:
---------------------------------------
So the screwy config should be removed. That leaves us with the non-existant
dir, should we warn about this? I am thinking we should. Whats the use case
for having the config point to a non-existant dir?
> Accumulo Classpath warnings should only be printed with classpath command
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-948
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-948
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: John Vines
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> Debug was added to document if any classpath items did not contribute any
> items to the classpath. Besides these breaking several scripts, they get
> extremely annoying. I do value the output, but I think that it should be
> reserved for the classpath command, which is what users will use when they
> are actually analyzing their classpath.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
