[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13762258#comment-13762258
]
Christopher Tubbs commented on ACCUMULO-1229:
---------------------------------------------
I think Option 4 is not entirely unreasonable, if we only talk to ZK to get
this information, unauthenticated. However, I share the concern that this
encourages users to operate in a way that creates a single point of failure.
> ZooKeeperInstance.getZookeepers() should return all zookeepers, not just what
> was given to the constructor
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-1229
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1229
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: client
> Reporter: John Vines
> Priority: Minor
>
> Currently the suggested Instance is ZooKeeperInstance, which requires an
> instance name and all zookeepers the client should use to be specified. The
> client could reference just one or not necessarily all of them. The API
> should be able to get all of the known zookeepers from the system, so we
> should reduce the burden on the clients for ZooKeeper instance and just have
> them list at least one to get initial contact and then update the Instance
> appropriately.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
