[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13776449#comment-13776449
 ] 

Billie Rinaldi edited comment on ACCUMULO-391 at 9/24/13 4:38 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

Anyone have comments on using TableKey vs. a plain Key?

Nevermind, it looks like TableKey is still there but isn't being used.  I'm 
still looking over the patch, but the only comment I have so far is that it 
seems to include diffs for a couple of files it shouldn't.
                
      was (Author: billie.rinaldi):
    Anyone have comments on using TableKey vs. a plain Key?
                  
> Multi-table Accumulo input format
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-391
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-391
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: John Vines
>            Assignee: Corey J. Nolet
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: mapreduce,
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>         Attachments: ACCUMULO-391.patch, multi-table-if.patch, 
> new-multitable-if.patch
>
>
> Just realized we had no MR input method which supports multiple Tables for an 
> input format. I would see it making the table the mapper's key and making the 
> Key/Value a tuple, or alternatively have the Table/Key be the key tuple and 
> stick with Values being the value.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to