[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13812220#comment-13812220
]
Christopher Tubbs commented on ACCUMULO-1834:
---------------------------------------------
CTR says reviews aren't required for a commit, but it doesn't rule it out as an
option. In these cases (such as an anticipated concern about the readiness or
quality of a feature implementation), it seems like a formal vote is still an
option. To exercise that option, it seems to me that the formal voting should
take place on the mailing list, just like other votes, not in ReviewBoard.
ReviewBoard feedback can, of course, be used to inform a committer's decision
to call a formal vote.
> ReviewBoard guidelines
> ----------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-1834
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1834
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: docs
> Reporter: Josh Elser
> Labels: Documentation
> Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>
> We currently don't have any guidelines on how we should be using reviewboard.
> For example -- How many "ship it"'s are needed to merit consensus? How do we
> make sure that reviews get applied after consensus is reached?
> Figure out what to do and then write it down.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
