[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13858523#comment-13858523
 ] 

Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-2100:
--------------------------------------

[~mjwall] and I were talking about the GAV for the archetype as well. I think 
we both agreed that it would make more sense to have the archetype implement 
its own versioning instead of trying to match what Accumulo does (as I 
previously did).

So, for whatever versions of Accumulo we have as "active", we could make an 
accumulo-instamo-archetype-X (where X is the Accumulo major version). A couple 
of nice gains come from this:

1. As we update the archetype, users don't have to update the version string 
they use
2. Users will automatically get the newest version of Accumulo in that major 
release.

> instamo-archetype could use a little clean up
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-2100
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2100
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: instamo-archetype
>            Reporter: Michael Wall
>            Assignee: Josh Elser
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Some of the things I noticed
> - mvn test fails, because it took longer than 30 secs to startup the MAC on 
> my linux box.
> - README needs to be updated, usage is incorrect
> - pom.xml doesn't hook exec:exec into any lifecycle so you have to call mvn 
> compile exec:exec -Pwhatever
> - Could abstract out a MiniAccumuloClusterWrapper to handle the temp 
> directory clean up and make the usage across the ShellExample, 
> MapReduceExample and ExampleAccumuloUnitTest consistent.  Would also make it 
> easier to implement ACCUMULO-2097 and ACCUMULO-2098
> BTW, I am running this against the origin/1.5 branch, targeting an archetype 
> that is compatible with Accumulo 1.5.0
> Patch coming for review



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to