[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13890317#comment-13890317
]
Keith Turner commented on ACCUMULO-118:
---------------------------------------
My comment about voting on design documents was a possible solution to a
problem. The problem is how can we get peer reviewed designs? How can we
motivate each other to spend a good chunk of time critically thinking about our
designs. This issue had a design document and I remember reading and thinking
"makes sense". I do not remember investing much time trying to find flaws with
it, I think I just wanted to get back to whatever I was immersed in at the
time. My thinking is that calling for a vote on the dev list after writing a
design doc for a feature seems like a simple thing to try w/o any additional
overhead because we have the dev list in place.
> accumulo could work across HDFS instances, which would help it to scale past
> a single namenode
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-118
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-118
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: master, tserver
> Reporter: Eric Newton
> Assignee: Eric Newton
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.6.0
>
> Attachments: ACCUMULO-118-01.txt, ACCUMULO-118-02.txt
>
> Original Estimate: 2,016h
> Remaining Estimate: 2,016h
>
> Consider using full path names to files, which would allow the servers to
> access the files on any HDFS file system.
> Work may exist elsewhere to run HDFS using a number of NameNode instances to
> break up the namespace.
> We may need a pluggable strategy to determine namespace for new files.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
