[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13890455#comment-13890455
]
Vikram Srivastava commented on ACCUMULO-2299:
---------------------------------------------
[~elserj] Thanks for the feedback.
1. I didn't use expected parameter because the test class was inheriting
TestCase instead of using @Test. But I can change the class to use @Test unless
anyone has objections.
2. To be clear, you are asking about testing the new "readField" method in
isolation with the truncated byte array, right?
3. I don't feel strongly against using either exception. I'll change it to
IOException.
> WholeRowIterator.decodeRow should check input stream return val
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-2299
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2299
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.4.4, 1.5.0
> Reporter: Josh Elser
> Assignee: Vikram Srivastava
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: newbie
> Fix For: 1.5.1
>
> Attachments: ACCUMULO-2299.v1.patch.txt, ACCUMULO-2299.v2.patch.txt
>
>
> The decodeRow method ignores the return code on the DataInputStream.read
> calls. If that return value is inspected, we can catch errors where the data
> is malformed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)