[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13999221#comment-13999221
 ] 

Gary Singh commented on ACCUMULO-2758:
--------------------------------------

Josh, 

I didn't remove the encodeColumnFamily method as there was another method using 
it. I removed the references to the offset though. Let me know if the 
ACCUMULO-2758-2.patch works. 
Also, as I'm new and have not used Git before, can you please give me an 
example of a good patch? There isn't an example on the contributor guidelines 
page. 

> LocalityGroupUtil.encodeColumnFamily() ignores offset parameter
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-2758
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2758
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.5, 1.5.1
>            Reporter: Bill Havanki
>            Assignee: Gary Singh
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: newbie
>             Fix For: 1.5.2, 1.6.1, 1.7.0
>
>         Attachments: ACCUMULO-2758-2.patch, ACCUMULO-2758.patch
>
>
> The method {{LocalityGroupUtil.encodeColumnFamily(ByteSequence)}} heeds the 
> current offset and length of the byte sequence, passing them to an private 
> method that does the encoding. However, the private method ignores its offset 
> parameter, and always starts from the beginning of the byte array.
> Fortunately, it appears that there are no callers for the public method, and 
> the other caller of the private method always passes an offset of zero. So, 
> the bug is probably not expressed. The method with the bug should probably 
> just be eliminated.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to