[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14269491#comment-14269491
]
Corey J. Nolet edited comment on ACCUMULO-2641 at 1/8/15 4:16 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
As far as I can tell, the only change was the addition of the
serialVersionUuid? I did just notice that I clobbered a comment in the
ActiveScan class that explains it but that's going to be clobbered anyways.
I've been battling with this for awhile whenever the thrift profile has run-
I'm not sure if this problem was just introduced in this ticket. It's one of
the reasons I created ACCUMULO-3433. Last time i ran the thrift profile, I ran
into the issue where the build failed as a result of the files being
regenerated.
was (Author: sonixbp):
As far as I can tell, the only change was the addition of the
serialVersionUuid? I did just notice that I clobbered a comment in the
ActiveScan class that explains it but that's going to be clobbered anyways.
I've been battling with this for awhile whenever the thrift profile has run-
I'm not sure if this problem was just introduced in this ticket. It's one of
the reasons I created ACCUMULO-3002. Last time i ran the thrift profile, I ran
into the issue where the build failed as a result of the files being
regenerated.
> scan id not set in org.apache.accumulo.core.client.admin.ActiveScan
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ACCUMULO-2641
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2641
> Project: Accumulo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: client
> Affects Versions: 1.4.4, 1.5.1
> Reporter: Ed Coleman
> Assignee: Ed Coleman
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.6.2, 1.7.0
>
> Attachments: ACCUMULO-2641.patch
>
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Trying to profile some long running scans I tried to use the getScanid()
> method on ActiveScan, but it always returned 0.
> Looking at the class, it seems that the value is never set. There is a
> getter but no setter and it is not set in the constructor.
> Also, it seems that the scanid is not included in the thrift ActiveScan so a
> fix will not be a simple as just setting scanid in the constructor.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
